Big Neil Gaiman fan here – for reals. That sexy accent, the mad halo of hair, the general sort of unpredictability of just what will come out of his head next…So, while I enjoyed Trigger Warning (Neil Gaiman, 2015), I have to admit to finding it a little…lacking. In fairness, the stories, poems, and tales that comprise the book were all published elsewhere and for different purposes. So, where the pieces are individually strong it is not simply my imagination that finds them somewhat disjointed, not necessarily…compatible. In fact, individually, I think I may have actually loved it a little bit. I found it at times ethereal and haunting, funny, odd, fragile, and beguiling. There is a bit in the beginning that exists for no other purpose than to describe the circumstances in which each contribution was conceived, and it is fascinating and at least somewhat brilliant.
Overall, my most serious complaint is with regard to the title. I’ve come to think of a trigger warning as something specific to what I will reluctantly call ‘woman trauma.’ I understand that all manner of people and some creatures can be victimized, but, for whatever reason, I think of trigger warnings as notes of caution for women who have suffered abuse as opposed to say, people who are afraid of tentacles…This is, perhaps, a small distinction, but in the world where names are imbued with nothing more nor less than the meaning we assign them it feels important to me to point out that this book was not what I was told it would be. I didn’t want to read about women being subjected to abuse, but I did want to know what I was getting into. I am not sure Trigger Warning achieved this end.
Click Clack and the Rattlebag was excellent.
One thought on “The ‘Trigger Warning’ that wasn’t”
It is the title that has kept me from putting this at the top of my to-read list.